Samsung RF511/RF411/RF711

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSamsung RF511/RF411/RF711  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RF511/RF411/RF711
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '19 at 17:44
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 146
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 317
37% 286 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0A5) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 4.54
Parallax 1.41
2% 2.67 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.87
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GSSD230S 512GB
453GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 239 243 231 227 231 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.7% Good
Read 260
Write 242
Mixed 229
SusWrite 233
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 29.3
104% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 113
109% 172 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 111%
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 16GB
8GB free, PID 55a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
7.14% Terrible
Read 31.7
Write 5.5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 4.4
12% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.14%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-027.A01LF Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 11.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RF511/RF411/RF711 Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RF511/RF411/RF711

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback