Asrock Z270 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '19 at 04:17
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 131
2-Core 257
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 371
48% 362 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 32.2
Parallax 37.7
33% 36.8 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 37.3
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1502 1248 819 816 814 818 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2,506
Write 2151
Mixed 1787
SusWrite 1,003
416% 1,862 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 90.7
307% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,356
DQ Write 1,033
DQ Mixed 1,176
885% 1,189 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 310%
Great: 355%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
111GB free
Firmware: UE300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 82 81 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 435
Write 212
Mixed 171
SusWrite 88.7
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 19.6
74% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 80.2
DQ Mixed 42.6
47% 79.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 53%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 80 79 78 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 55
Write 78
Mixed 71
SusWrite 76.9
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.5
155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 66%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
129GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 147 147 150 149 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 126
Write 116
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 147
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 97%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
26GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.8 5.3 5.6 7.5 6.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 35
Write 7.7
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 6.1
15% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 3.2
166% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.3% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Extreme4 - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback