Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '19 at 22:23
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 98.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 208
83% 141 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 588
66% 520 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2862 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 212
Parallax 199
148% 198 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 196
Splatting 132
124% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
97GB free
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,962
Write 6,404
Mixed 6,520
1,480% 6,628 MB/s
4K Read 560
4K Write 256
4K Mixed 320
1,395% 379 MB/s
DQ Read 1172
DQ Write 734
DQ Mixed 757
617% 888 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Re 2TB-$35
575GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 127 125 126 134 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 124
Write 121
Mixed 101
SusWrite 128
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 83%
WD Re 2TB-$35
162GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 120 120 121 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 77.5
Write 76.8
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 120
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 83%
WD Re 2TB-$35
430GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 141 141 144 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 144
Write 138
Mixed 104
SusWrite 143
98% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
215% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 83%
WD Re 2TB-$35
252GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 135
Write 133
Mixed 105
SusWrite 76.2
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
225% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 83%
WD Re 2TB-$35
1TB free
Firmware: 8110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 122 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 122
Write 119
Mixed 93.7
SusWrite 122
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
225% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 83%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW-SD/MS 8GB
7GB free, PID 0301
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 24
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 25.9
35% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.3
146% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
76.8% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 24
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 22.8
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 44.7
90% 44.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-UP5 TH-CF Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $593
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback