YJKC vBook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 22%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemYJKC vBook  (all builds)
MotherboardYJKC AM01_V1
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161216
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateMay 27 '19 at 20:59
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Pentium N4200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
1-Core 28.1
2-Core 51.9
19% 40 Pts
4-Core 93.9
8-Core 105
13% 99.3 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 3.7
1% 4.17 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 0.1
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 4%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Foresee 128GB SSD 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1229B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 134 139 168 153 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 360
Write 155
Mixed 160
SusWrite 148
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 8.2
46% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 70.6
73% 120 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
23.4% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 221
18% 221 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical vBook Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 28%
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: YJKC vBook

The Best.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback