Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF (all builds)
Memory	23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	May 27 '19 at 08:35
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 71.2 1-Core 107 2-Core 213 72% 130 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 826 74% 626 Pts	64-Core 1,169 72% 1,169 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 3731) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.17 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 19.9 Reflection 23 Parallax 18.6 16% 20.5 fps	MRender 28.4 Gravity 19.9 Splatting 25.9 20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 480 Write 349 Mixed 150 72% 326 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 72.7 4K Mixed 36.4 124% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 108 122% 207 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Hitachi HTS725032A7E630 320GB-$89 9,811 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 254GB free Firmware: GHBOA500 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 100 99 102 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 112 Write 104 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 101 61% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 59%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 232 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 188 184 186 186 202 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 208 Write 157 Mixed 86.5 SusWrite 188 117% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	51% Above average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.1 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 18 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 98.7 40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 4,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 80%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	888x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	633x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	465x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	286x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	254x
RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	242x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	157x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	107x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	107x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	241x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	223x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	218x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $418

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16