Asrock H61M-VS4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VS4  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 26 '19 at 21:24
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 177
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 467
46% 378 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.9% Good
Lighting 77.3
Reflection 76.9
Parallax 67.1
63% 73.7 fps
MRender 72.9
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 73.7
60% 73 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD5000AZRX-00A8LB0 120GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 69 58 53 34 74 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 262
Write 246
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 81.8
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 30.5
116% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 96.5
88% 135 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 71%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
58GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 97 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 104
Write 96.5
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 96.8
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
203% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 79%
Seagate ST3160211AS 160GB
141GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 70 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 69.8
Write 11.5
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 70.3
33% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 40%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.2 3.8 3.9 3.8 3.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 6.7
Mixed 7
SusWrite 4.1
12% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.6
154% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.9% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VS4 Builds (Compare 272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback