Lenovo 80TG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80TG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 26 '19 at 18:42
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3350
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Memory 41.9
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 70.2
32% 52.4 Pts
4-Core 59.1
8-Core 58
8% 58.5 Pts
64-Core 53.1
3% 53.1 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6861
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 0.83
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.84
1% 0.88 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.96
1% 1.45 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G3BTND-N210A 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 85 85 100 101 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 291
Write 126
Mixed 129
SusWrite 95.8
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 12.9
61% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 90.4
DQ Write 82.2
DQ Mixed 81.1
62% 84.6 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80TG Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80TG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback