Gbt___ GBTUACPI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGbt___ GBTUACPI  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 965P-S3
Memory3.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070528
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 26 '19 at 09:44
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$250
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
29.2% Poor
SC Int 63.3
SC Float 29.5
SC Mixed 41.2
36% 44.7 Pts
QC Int 211
QC Float 94.9
QC Mixed 150
35% 152 Pts
MC Int 239
MC Float 113
MC Mixed 151
26% 167 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Lighting 76.8
Reflection 63.6
Parallax 105
27% 81.8 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 90.5
Splatting 59.1
32% 73.7 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 31%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$53
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 172 175 136 88 119 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.3% Average
Read 215
Write 201
Mixed 194
SusWrite 142
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 24
94% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.7
DQ Write 72.8
DQ Mixed 36
32% 47.2 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 127%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$44
516GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 100 96 99 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57% Above average
Read 101
Write 97.4
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 97.6
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 57%
Great: 116%
ASMT 2115 500GB
96GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 25.3
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 24.9
35% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 161%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 27%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical GBTUACPI Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Gbt___ GBTUACPI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $286
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $365Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $87
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $144Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback