Gbt___ GBTUACPI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGbt___ GBTUACPI  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 965P-S3
Memory3.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070528
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 26 '19 at 09:44
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$250
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
26.9% Poor
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 79.7
29% 60.4 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 152
21% 151 Pts
64-Core 151
10% 151 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 76.8
Reflection 63.6
Parallax 105
21% 81.8 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 90.5
Splatting 59.1
24% 73.7 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 23%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$51
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 172 175 136 88 119 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.3% Average
Read 215
Write 201
Mixed 194
SusWrite 142
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 24
94% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.7
DQ Write 72.8
DQ Mixed 36
32% 47.2 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
516GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 100 96 99 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 101
Write 97.4
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 97.6
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57%
Great: 116%
ASMT 2115 500GB
96GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 25.3
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 24.9
35% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 166%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 26%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GBTUACPI Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Gbt___ GBTUACPI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $190
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $138Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 5700 $370Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340AMD RX 590 $186Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback