Asrock Z97M OC Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z97M OC Formula  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151013
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 20 '16 at 12:04
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 97.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 230
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 464
62% 463 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 285-$189
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.134.1
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31% Below average
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 41
Parallax 34.9
30% 37.5 fps
MRender 48.9
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 37.5
34% 41.5 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$60
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,386
Write 586
Mixed 812
204% 928 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 28.8
177% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 458
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 30.1
109% 246 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 159%
Great: 213%
WD My Passport 0810 1TB
675GB free, PID 0810
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 102
Write 95.9
Mixed 86.6
120% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.15
4K Mixed 0.22
82% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C8 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 23.3
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 22.8
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 48.4
83% 48.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M OC Formula Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z97M OC Formula - $252

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $775
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback