Gigabyte GA-B360M D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B360M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360M D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 25 '19 at 13:43
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 249
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 692
70% 570 Pts
64-Core 708
44% 708 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2195 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Lighting 93.8
Reflection 83.6
Parallax 80.3
76% 85.9 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 74.4
62% 75.5 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 176 70 219 143 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 458
Write 452
Mixed 389
SusWrite 182
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 33.7
118% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 300
208% 258 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
652GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 159 156 160 160 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 148
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 158
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
246% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.1
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 10.9
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback