Asus K401LB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
8 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAsus K401LB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K401LB
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150305
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateSep 20 '16 at 04:26
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 52.3
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 142
53% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 213
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Asus(1043 1A9D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3977
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.09% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 9.92
Parallax 6.59
4% 7.24 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 5
Splatting 10.8
7% 7.91 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.09%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.56.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 427
Write 252
Mixed 298
72% 326 MB/s
4K Read 7.92
4K Write 9.23
4K Mixed 4.55
23% 7.23 MB/s
DQ Read 13.6
DQ Write 8.7
DQ Mixed 3.97
5% 8.75 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB
906GB free
Firmware: SE0OA4A0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 93.9
Write 95.5
Mixed 94.2
71% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.17
75% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD3-1600 Samsung 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.1% Average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 11.5
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K401LB Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K401LB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback