Seneca PRO505592

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSeneca PRO505592  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H97I-PLUS
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '19 at 02:51
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 395
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 309 309 306 298 305 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 447
Mixed 333
SusWrite 318
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 58.4
170% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 354
258% 335 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
453GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 164 165 166 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 173
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 165
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 16.4
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback