Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '19 at 23:08
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 228
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 601
63% 507 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 3776) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Lighting 43.4
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 52.7
35% 46.1 fps
MRender 55.5
Gravity 48.7
Splatting 40.5
39% 48.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 128 105 99 88 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 188
Mixed 333
SusWrite 107
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 57.5
193% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 166
127% 171 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
207GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 135 136 136 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
68% Good
Read 101
Write 78.5
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 136
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68%
Great: 112%
WD My Passport 1.5TB
589GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 66 66 66 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 49.5
Write 58.3
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 65.1
70% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 44%
WD My Book 1230 2TB
40GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 92 90 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 93.5
Write 90.3
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 93.7
111% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.6
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 5,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback