Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '19 at 20:17
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	47%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$145 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Memory 87 1-Core 132 2-Core 256 88% 159 Pts	4-Core 469 8-Core 579 67% 524 Pts	64-Core 541 34% 541 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	59.7% Above average	Lighting 65.2 Reflection 70.5 Parallax 90 53% 75.3 fps	MRender 87.7 Gravity 86.9 Splatting 89.5 72% 88 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 88%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 298 299 297 265 299 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Read 415 Write 406 Mixed 358 SusWrite 298 83% 369 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 37.7 132% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 347 262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 1x16GB 2,305 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 13.8 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 10.9 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $275Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,862x
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,482x
Core i5-9600KIntel $145Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,390x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	513x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	502x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	442x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	357x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	262x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	223x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	277x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	241x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	183x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $813

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16