HP 24-g020

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP 24-g020  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8245
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181109
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMay 24 '19 at 01:30
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 41.3
2-Core 80.2
37% 58.7 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 148
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 145
10% 145 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 8245) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 11.5
2% 10.7 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 7.7
2% 6.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 4%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$42
782GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 162 157 167 172 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 187
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 162
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata AM1L16BC8R2-B1XS 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 32%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 24-g020 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP 24-g020

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $56
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback