Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 74.1 1-Core 115 2-Core 205 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 629 60% 496 Pts	64-Core 630 39% 630 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 36 33 37 37 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 476 Write 433 Mixed 307 SusWrite 64.4 71% 320 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 55.2 4K Mixed 36.7 118% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 140 113% 160 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 335GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 103 103 103 104 103 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 100 Write 101 Mixed 65.3 SusWrite 104 68% 92.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$30 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.7% Very good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 23.6 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 21 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 92.2 43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 70%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 64%

Destroyer

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	116x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	111x
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples	97x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	142x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 52,667 samples	139x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	120x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $472

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16