Asrock H61M-VS

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-VS (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120910
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '19 at 21:45
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 89.5 2-Core 179 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 342 39% 303 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3418) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57% Above average	Lighting 71.7 Reflection 69.8 Parallax 101 58% 80.8 fps	MRender 72 Gravity 73.7 Splatting 57.2 54% 67.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199 10,165 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 74 83 80 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 161 Write 92 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 78.7 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 13.4 4K Mixed 17.5 64% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 24.9 DQ Write 16.3 DQ Mixed 16.3 13% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 66%
Corsair Force 80GB-$67 138 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 58GB free Firmware: 2.1a SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 39 42 40 41 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 136 Write 53.5 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 41.5 16% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 51.3 4K Mixed 21.6 89% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 25.3 DQ Write 52.6 DQ Mixed 24.9 23% 34.3 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 2x4GB 2,152 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 13.5 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 13.4 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-VS Builds (Compare 377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	62x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	41x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	29x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	54x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x
SSD 120GBGigabyte $30Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	11x

RAM
PSD38G16002 2x8GBPatriotBench 52%, 6,044 samples	10x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	9x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $77

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16