Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '19 at 13:25
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Memory 86.7 1-Core 123 2-Core 245 84% 152 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 475 63% 473 Pts	64-Core 475 29% 475 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.3 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.7% Above average	Lighting 64.7 Reflection 71.7 Parallax 91.4 53% 76 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 66.3 Splatting 57.7 52% 65.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53 30,265 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.R Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 534 249 253 254 213 237 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Read 659 Write 657 Mixed 605 SusWrite 290 124% 553 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 26.4 103% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 445 DQ Write 452 DQ Mixed 572 396% 490 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 141%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 89GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 74 81 84 77 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 87 Write 102 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 79.5 50% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 108%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 107GB free Firmware: JKAOA3NH SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 87 86 85 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 83.5 Write 73.7 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 85.6 53% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 43GB free Firmware: CC4A SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 66 69 67 71 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 70.7 Write 65.5 Mixed 54.3 SusWrite 68.5 48% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 87GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 106 104 103 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 53.7 Write 132 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 103 60% 81.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.4 116% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FB 2x8GB 1,404 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3333 MHz clocked @ 1667 MHz Performing below potential (98^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	107% Outstanding	MC Read 38.9 MC Write 38.5 MC Mixed 38.3 110% 38.6 GB/s	SC Read 25.9 SC Write 43.9 SC Mixed 28.3 93% 32.7 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	421x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	218x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $23Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $644

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)