Razer Blade Pro

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Razer Blade Pro (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer Razer
Memory	26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180222
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 21 '19 at 12:32
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820HK 18,903 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 92.6 1-Core 135 2-Core 257 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 562 59% 471 Pts	64-Core 590 36% 590 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile) 17,197 User benchmarks, average bench 95% Device(1A58 6754) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.2% Excellent	Lighting 101 Reflection 127 Parallax 104 82% 111 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 112 Splatting 97.6 85% 104 fps
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 7,823 User benchmarks, average bench 320% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1283 1599 1631 1774 1834 1861 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	302% Outstanding	Read 2343 Write 2,040 Mixed 1,234 SusWrite 1,664 408% 1,820 MB/s	4K Read 47.9 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 64.9 215% 74.9 MB/s	DQ Read 979 DQ Write 814 DQ Mixed 893 670% 896 MB/s
Poor: 141% ↑ This bench: 302% Great: 531%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB 1,926 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0406 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 162 164 165 165 164 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Read 147 Write 155 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 162 31% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 8.6 4K Mixed 0.7 6% 3.33 MB/s	DQ Read 1.2 DQ Write 7.8 DQ Mixed 2.1 2% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 18%
Hitachi HTS 721010A9E630 1TB 1,664 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 412GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 109 108 111 110 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 115 Write 104 Mixed 26 SusWrite 109 64% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 76%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 119GB free, PID 0747 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	6.45% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 12.7 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 14.8 19% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 14% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 6.45% Great: 45%
WD My Passport 2TB 10,723 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2TB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 38 41 44 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 44.5 Write 43.8 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 41.8 57% 41.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6B1 2x16GB 409 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	87.2% Excellent	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 34.4 MC Mixed 27.5 89% 31 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 34.5 SC Mixed 25.2 75% 26.4 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Pro Builds (Compare 295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: Razer Blade Pro

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	125x
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	94x
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 1080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 95%, 17,197 samples	122x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	62x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	59x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	35x
Raid 0 Volume 1TBIntelBench 242%, 17,176 samples	32x
MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 121%, 3,154 samples	24x

RAM
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6B1 2x16GBMicronBench 86%, 409 samples	82x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 23,910 samples	61x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16