MSI B450M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7A38)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A38
MotherboardMSI B450M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7A38)  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190107
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 21 '19 at 03:05
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 188
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 355
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500
XFX(1682 6570) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Lighting 5.97
Reflection 6.12
Parallax 5.06
5% 5.71 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 5.13
4% 4.76 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$66
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 286 303 304 331 330 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 386
Mixed 372
SusWrite 313
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 43.6
140% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 120
155% 278 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 127%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
174GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 294 305 289 314 312 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 436
Mixed 384
SusWrite 316
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 48.8
166% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 362
274% 368 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27
13GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 22 21 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 143
Write 50.2
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 21.9
62% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.2
135% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 90%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
15GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 30 29 31 31 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 38
Write 30.7
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 30.1
44% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 3.9
259% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 26.7
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22.1
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7A38) Builds (Compare 1,179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B450M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7A38)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $339
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback