Asrock H370 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H370 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180919
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 20 '19 at 17:22
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 274
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 899
88% 723 Pts
64-Core 1,117
69% 1,117 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.72
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 125
Parallax 124
103% 125 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 123
Splatting 102
95% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 109 109 110 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 384
Write 106
Mixed 144
SusWrite 108
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 18.8
76% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 99.4
DQ Write 39.1
DQ Mixed 44.8
40% 61.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 73%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
64GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 116 114 118 118 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 368
Write 196
Mixed 196
SusWrite 123
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 11.5
84% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 20.7
64% 137 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
665GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 177 180 178 183 180 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Intenso Ultra Line 32GB
26GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 24 23 22 24 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 106
Write 23.7
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 22.7
44% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 2.2
118% 3 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 33%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
307GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 39
Write 40.5
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 42.7
44% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.7% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 19.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 23.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H370 Pro4 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock H370 Pro4 - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback