Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory	186.2 GB free of 192 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181210
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 20 '19 at 11:03
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6126 28 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 51 1-Core 103 2-Core 214 65% 123 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 791 73% 608 Pts	64-Core 3456 214% 3456 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620 6,548 User benchmarks, average bench 18% Nvidia(10DE 1264) 2GB CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Lighting 23.2 Reflection 22.5 Parallax 19.5 19% 21.7 fps	MRender 25.4 Gravity 21.3 Splatting 20.9 18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HUS722T2TALA604 2TB 1,161 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: RAGNWA07 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 152 155 164 161 154 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 60.1 Write 110 Mixed 77.9 SusWrite 158 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.9 208% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 111%
Hitachi HUS722T2TALA604 2TB 1,161 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: RAGNWA07 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 190 191 191 190 192 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 155 Write 232 Mixed 112 SusWrite 192 127% 173 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 394% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CRC M393A2G40EB1-CRC M393A2G40EB1-CRC M393A2G40EB1-CRC M393A2G40EB1-CRC M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40EB1-CRC M393A2G40EB1-CRC M393A2G40EB1-CRC M393A... 192GB 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2133, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	128% Outstanding	MC Read 46.2 MC Write 70.1 MC Mixed 46.8 155% 54.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 7.5 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 157%

UFO

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 213%

UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

CPU
CPU: Intel 0000%@1stBench 76%, 50 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4214R1stBench 70%, 89 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41101stBench 62%, 546 samples	10x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	15x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	14x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	11x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	18x
AN1500 2TBWd_blackBench 325%, 313 samples	11x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	9x

RAM
M393A4K40CB2-CTD 4x31.8GBSamsungBench 77%, 188 samples	9x
18ASF2G72PDZ-2G9J3 8x16GBMicronBench 100%, 7 samples	6x
M393A4K40CB2-CTD 6x31.8GBSamsungBench 123%, 52 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $1,306

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16