Acer Swift SF314-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Swift SF314-52  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Suntory_KL
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '19 at 08:24
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 87.2
1-Core 3.7
2-Core 43.4
35% 44.8 Pts
4-Core 13.6
8-Core 13.4
2% 13.5 Pts
64-Core 26.4
2% 26.4 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 118C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4771
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.96% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 9.73
Parallax 6.09
2% 5.94 fps
MRender 9.43
Gravity 5.93
Splatting 14.2
8% 9.85 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ripjaws S3 120GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1217A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 99 55 55 55 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 432
Write 357
Mixed 321
SusWrite 92
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 18.2
92% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 111
134% 233 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA425S6AFR6N-TF 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 20.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 0.9
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-52 Builds (Compare 246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback