HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180807
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 20 '19 at 02:00
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-8700-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
SC Int 123
SC Float 135
SC Mixed 129
103% 129 Pts
QC Int 426
QC Float 456
QC Mixed 427
99% 436 Pts
MC Int 760
MC Float 850
MC Mixed 792
120% 801 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$168
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Lighting 168
Reflection 150
Parallax 163
51% 160 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 168
Splatting 136
62% 146 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 71%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 709 721 736 712 731 701 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 870
Write 744
Mixed 654
SusWrite 718
168% 747 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 49
160% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 650
DQ Write 454
DQ Mixed 546
409% 550 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 153%
Great: 161%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$37
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 186 182 179 183 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 182
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 182
103% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 13
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 12.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 1,445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $448
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $144Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $75SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback