Samsung R425D/R525D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung R425D/R525D  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R425D/R525D
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110507
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 19 '19 at 20:23
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II N970 Quad-Core
Socket ASB2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Memory 37.6
1-Core 28.4
2-Core 61.9
26% 42.6 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 125
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Sanyo(144D C584) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.0
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 68 61 59 53 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 380
Write 300
Mixed 271
SusWrite 83.7
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 16
58% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 120
108% 165 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CF8 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 533 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
17.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 5.8
17% 6 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 4.5
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R425D/R525D Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R425D/R525D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $38
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback