MSI 760GA-P43(FX) (MS-7699)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7699
MotherboardMSI 760GA-P43(FX) (MS-7699)  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121026
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '16 at 22:13
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 112
54% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 286
32% 249 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Nvidia(10DE 1016) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 20.5
14% 17.9 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 14.8
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
298GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 57.4
Write 59.7
Mixed 54
43% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.34
94% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
193GB free
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 101
Write 107
Mixed 28.5
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 38.5
Write 44.5
Mixed 40.9
31% 41.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.27
87% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24%
Great: 60%
MAIWO GZX202 165GB
153GB free, PID 6101
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.3% Below average
Read 74.4
Write 75.8
Mixed 26
71% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.32
89% 1.06 MB/s
MAIWO GZX202 500GB
152GB free, PID 6101
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.1% Poor
Read 53.7
Write 55.5
Mixed 27.5
56% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.31
4K Mixed 0.32
92% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.1% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.2
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GA-P43(FX) (MS-7699) Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI 760GA-P43(FX) (MS-7699)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $453
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback