Dell PowerEdge R410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell PowerEdge R410
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R410  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '19 at 23:00
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5520
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 117
47% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 302
31% 248 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC 6/i Adapter 159GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 60 59 71 72 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
Read 73.6
Write 73.2
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 66.9
46% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 55%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
54GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 22 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 25.4
Write 20.6
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 20.1
28% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.7
162% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 36KSF1G72PDZ-1G1K1 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.7
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge R410 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback