Lenovo 10AHS1PH00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10AHS1PH00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '19 at 18:37
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 35.1
2-Core 133
49% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 231
32% 234 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 309F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 3.33
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 4.22
3% 4.22 fps
MRender 6.71
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 7.3
5% 5.44 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 123 119 121 117 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 249
Write 134
Mixed 143
SusWrite 122
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 19.8
71% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 68.7
DQ Mixed 64.4
58% 89.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 48%
Ucs-sdhpcie 800GB 800GB
745GB free
Firmware: KMCCP105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 633 653 616 673 675 671 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 325
Write 633
Mixed 372
SusWrite 653
113% 496 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 49.7
173% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 848
DQ Write 728
DQ Mixed 814
603% 797 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 141%
Great: 155%
Toshiba MG03ACA300 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: FL1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 125 124 129 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 128
Write 129
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 125
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.3% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 14.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback