ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus G551JM

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus G551JM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G551JM
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20141013
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 16 '19 at 19:40
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710HQ 69,536 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 97.9 2-Core 190 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 467 49% 393 Pts	64-Core 517 32% 517 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 185D) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3574 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.59% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 15 Parallax 6.75 4% 8.96 fps	MRender 8.95 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 8.13 5% 6.51 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.59% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X300s Non-Secure 256GB 2,451 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2150000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 214 216 236 221 237 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Read 417 Write 344 Mixed 150 SusWrite 236 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 62.6 4K Mixed 27 104% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 46.6 98% 204 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 98%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 455GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 91 91 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 85.3 Write 83.7 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 91.7 110% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.7 173% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 59%
WD My Book 1140 4TB 1,831 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 453GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 106 110 111 111 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 108 Write 97.3 Mixed 29 SusWrite 109 113% 86 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB 30,591 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	56% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 16.5 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 18.8 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical G551JM Builds (Compare 387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G551JM

CPU
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	369x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	16x
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	240x
GTX 860MNvidiaBench 16%, 18,736 samples	147x

SSD
X300s Non-Secure 256GBSanDiskBench 82%, 2,451 samples	22x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	11x
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	11x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	115x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	58x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback