| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 17.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME B360M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180803 |
| Uptime | 1.6 Days |
| Run Date | May 16 '19 at 05:49 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 49% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
79.4%
Very good
|
78% 133 Pts
|
54% 406 Pts
|
26% 425 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.8%
Poor
|
28% 26 fps
|
28% 34.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 33 73 48 45 42 MB/s
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
19% 87.3 MB/s
|
31% 8.87 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
102GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 87 89 91 89 MB/s
|
28%
Poor
|
25% 34.8 MB/s
|
142% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
75.7%
Very good
|
78% 27.2 GB/s
|
60% 21 GB/s
|
60% 66.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME B360M-A Builds (Compare 7,524 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME B360M-A - $495
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,542x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 1,320x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 1,280x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 488x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 447x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 426x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $1,023 |