TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics87.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock H81M-VG4 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150424
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 15 '19 at 06:32
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 250
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 508
69% 513 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 92.1%
 Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
MSI(1462 3301)
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 117
Parallax 98.8
90% 109 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 103
Splatting 104
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 87.8%
 Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 389 398 458 459 352 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 439
Mixed 432
SusWrite 412
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 58.8
200% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 239
196% 276 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 121%
 Great: 107%
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB
66GB free
Firmware: 78.06F.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 58 57 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 71.7
Write 69.2
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 57.7
46% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 37.2%
 Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.CAGF8.9KK0C 1315 BL51264BA160A.16FH 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.6% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 14.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 57.6
69% 57.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 52.6%
 Great: 64%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H81M-VG4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel  $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples255x
Core i3-4170Intel  $20Bench 57%, 48,178 samples144x
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples122x
GPU
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples132x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples119x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples87x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples73x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples49x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples36x
RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples26x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples21x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback