MSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7786
MotherboardMSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786)  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '19 at 20:01
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 631
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 40.8
2-Core 81
44% 65.6 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 127
20% 144 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 1.97
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 1.57
Splatting 1.96
2% 1.79 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 120GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 83 83 94 95 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.8% Average
Read 228
Write 220
Mixed 190
SusWrite 89.7
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 23.4
87% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 81.6
DQ Mixed 34.2
32% 47.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB
244GB free
Firmware: MS1OA600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 83 83 94 95 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 113
Write 103
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 89.9
60% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 82%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
212GB free
Firmware: GR2OA230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 60 62 61 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 77.6
Write 61.8
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 60.4
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G13332 12GB
0, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 7.6
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55M-P33 (MS-7786) Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786) - $65

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback