HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '19 at 16:54
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 186
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 581
54% 451 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.91% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 4.28
4% 4.24 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 7.04
4% 5.35 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.91%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitach HTS722010K9SA00 100GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC2ZC75A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 27 31 34 33 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.6% Poor
Read 58.6
Write 39.7
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 30.3
28% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 25%
WD k SDSSD External 240GB
116GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 40.2
Write 42.4
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 42.4
57% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 13.9
1,124% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 22.2
DQ Mixed 16.5
1,369% 17.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
32.3% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 9.9
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback