Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H81M-VG4 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160316
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 14 '19 at 08:58
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 182
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 351
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Asus(1043 83AD) 1GB
CLim: 594 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 7.13
Reflection 8.31
Parallax 5.78
6% 7.07 fps
MRender 7.67
Gravity 7.43
Splatting 8.04
6% 7.71 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Anacomda TS 120GB SSD
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0327B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 45 29 22 27 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 499
Write 424
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 77.5
56% 256 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 20.1
73% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 1.2
73% 170 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G160081 0420 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-VG4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback