ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Studio XPS 435MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	6.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

9 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Dell Studio XPS 435MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0R849J
Memory	3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20081114
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '15 at 15:36
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 67.5 2-Core 134 46% 100 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 395 38% 313 Pts	64-Core 386 24% 386 Pts
Poor: 46% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670 18,196 User benchmarks, average bench 6% PwrHis(1787 2294) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.301.1001.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.61% Terrible	Lighting 7.97 Reflection 9.54 Parallax 6.72 6% 8.07 fps	MRender 9 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 9.87 7% 8.19 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.61% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 5475887 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 2070174247724 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 334 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 57 (B1) Unknown 0 0 10 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 29 87 60135243805 (C2) HDA temperature 29 87 60135243805 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5475887 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5475887 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5475887 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11305 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3107 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3107 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1371	36.9% Below average	Read 196 Write 62.4 Mixed 62.1 23% 107 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 12.2 80% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 24 DQ Write 72.1 DQ Mixed 9.06 18% 35 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 69%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 325GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 86 86 5170 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1220 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 11441 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 29350 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 503 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 62 437583897 (C2) HDA temperature 74 62 454361114 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1778 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	44% Average	Read 73.2 Write 79.9 Mixed 67 55% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.43 110% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 59%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$80 10,362 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 157GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 172 6091 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2292 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 28290 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1862 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 190 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2301 (C2) HDA temperature 115 99 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	37.1% Below average	Read 65.3 Write 63.5 Mixed 63.1 48% 64 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.37 98% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 51%
TEAC USB HS-SD Card 16GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 11GB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	3.51% Terrible	Read 11.8 Write 6.39 Mixed 6.72 10% 8.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.59 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.006 6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.51% Great: 7%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Studio XPS 435MT Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 435MT

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	269x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	18x
Xeon W3580IntelBench 72%, 653 samples	13x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	17x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	13x
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	13x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x

RAM
6x1GBUnknownBench 41%, 2,345 samples	43x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	34x
24GBUnknownBench 43%, 14,716 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $184

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback