TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemGigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '19 at 23:49
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 153
2-Core 305
102% 185 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 846
88% 707 Pts
64-Core 734
45% 734 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85F1)
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 425.31
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 24.2
Parallax 19.7
17% 21.6 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 21
Splatting 27.4
22% 26.1 fps
Poor: 109% ↑
This bench: 18.6%
 Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$69
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM05.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 599 588 585 604 596 500 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 804
Write 600
Mixed 513
SusWrite 579
140% 624 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 34.9
147% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 516
DQ Write 616
DQ Mixed 495
393% 542 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑
This bench: 137%
 Great: 185%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
89GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 438 430 439 433 400 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 444
Mixed 373
SusWrite 435
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 50.3
173% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 115%
 Great: 134%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
305GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 109 109 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 177
Write 163
Mixed 32
SusWrite 108
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 81.7%
 Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 26.2
96% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 30.8
88% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 49.5
81% 49.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 96%
 Great: 88%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming - $165

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel  $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples988x
Core i5-7600KIntel  $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples328x
Core i7-7700Intel  $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples164x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples255x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples243x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples213x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples86x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples65x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples56x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples175x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples72x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples40x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $938
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback