Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte G1.Sniper B5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150813
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 11 '19 at 10:33
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 173
74% 123 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 282
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7790
Sapphire(174B E253) 1GB
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.10.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 30
Parallax 31
22% 29.2 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 32.8
24% 28.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
517GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,123
Write 39.2
Mixed 78.9
1,013% 1,414 MB/s
4K Read 710
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.3
29,766% 238 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB
547GB free
Firmware: AX1P2A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 79.5
Write 75
Mixed 30.3
45% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-2G 0420 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.1% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF Builds (Compare 763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback