Intel NUC8BEB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemIntel(R) NUC8i3BEH
MotherboardIntel NUC8BEB  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '19 at 07:37
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8109U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 113
2-Core 187
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 320
41% 312 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Intel(8086 2074) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6345
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 12.1
10% 12.1 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 18.6
12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 81 83 83 81 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 440
Write 100
Mixed 149
SusWrite 84.8
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 20.7
96% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 90.1
DQ Mixed 96.3
97% 164 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 95%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
25GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 7.2 7.8 7.5 7.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 76
Write 6
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 7.2
19% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
50% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800SO51216-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 26.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 12.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC8BEB Builds (Compare 1,721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC8BEB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback