Apple MacBookPro15,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemApple MacBookPro15,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-827FB448E656EC26
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '19 at 01:54
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8259U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 223
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 636
61% 503 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Apple(106B 0178) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 12.6
11% 12.5 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 11
Splatting 19.4
13% 15 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0256 251GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 177.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1025 1140 1095 1132 1096 1056 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT52L512M32D2PF-09 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 51
MC Mixed 22.8
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 14.7
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 103%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro15,2 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro15,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback