Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2640M 12,152 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	60% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 84.2 2-Core 146 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 195 28% 207 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21CE) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.21% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 3.62 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.56 fps	MRender 3.38 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.52 3% 3.08 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.21% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 258 261 252 258 262 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 334 Write 177 Mixed 261 SusWrite 258 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 15.8 54% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 311 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 180 163% 249 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-154.A00LF 2x8GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	49.6% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 15.9 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 14.9 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-2640MIntelBench 54%, 12,152 samples	9x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	9x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $112Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	1x
MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 61%, 6,630 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GBHynixBench 42%, 268 samples	1x
RMT3020EC58E9F1333 1x4GBRamaxelBench 25%, 2,506 samples	1x
99U5428-053.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 450 samples	1x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $28