HP HPE-599uk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP HPE-599uk  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB6
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110504
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 09 '19 at 14:36
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$183
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 149
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 414
43% 348 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 34
Parallax 45.7
31% 39.2 fps
MRender 30.4
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 39.7
29% 34.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31480GNTD 480GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 234 124 132 137 118 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.7% Below average
Read 172
Write 98.7
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 163
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 10
45% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 158
106% 121 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 98%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 115 115 115 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 115
Write 95.3
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 114
73% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.8% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback