TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120216
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 14 '14 at 13:09
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
73% 162 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 622
61% 499 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 59% Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
9GB free
Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 501
Write 105
Mixed 175
56% 260 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 14.1
89% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 37.9
61% 118 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 59.4%
 Great: 80%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
822GB free
Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 132
Write 164
Mixed 136
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 3.13
4K Mixed 0.63
163% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 85%
 Great: 75%
IET VIRTUAL-DISK 11GB
10GB free
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.2% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 20.9
Mixed 22
17% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.91
4K Write 0.53
4K Mixed 0.76
174% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 13.2%
 Great: 47%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.67% Terrible
Read 22.6
Write 16.2
Mixed 15.3
22% 18 MB/s
4K Read 3.53
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.32
35% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 8.67%
 Great: 7%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel  $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples185x
Core i7-3770KIntel  $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples173x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples158x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples54x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples51x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples48x
SSD
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples25x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples19x
RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples20x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 2,134 samples15x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples15x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $564
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback