Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics65% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '19 at 22:38
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 90
48% 72.9 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 237
25% 201 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.3
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65% Good
Lighting 66.1
Reflection 85.7
Parallax 133
54% 95 fps
MRender 85
Gravity 101
Splatting 123
87% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 65%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 431
Write 356
Mixed 340
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 31.1
107% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 164
147% 223 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 93%
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
8GB free
Firmware: 02.03B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 72 74 78 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 80
Write 73.5
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 74
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
24.9% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.7
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback