Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.12%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N455 2,770 User benchmarks, average bench 21% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.12% Terrible	Memory 14.8 1-Core 5 2-Core 7.8 7% 9.18 Pts	4-Core 9.6 8-Core 8.8 1% 9.2 Pts	64-Core 8 0% 8 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.12% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Biostar S100E-120GB 120GB 192 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1209B SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 111 108 109 111 118 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.8% Very poor	Read 165 Write 55.6 Mixed 90 SusWrite 110 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 3.3 18% 5.93 MB/s	DQ Read 35.9 DQ Write 24.7 DQ Mixed 10.8 13% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2% Terrible	MC Read 0.2 MC Write 0.7 MC Mixed 0.4 1% 0.43 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 0.7 SC Mixed 0.1 1% 0.4 GB/s	Latency 362 11% 362 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 2% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16