MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '19 at 20:34
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 754
75% 614 Pts
64-Core 1,019
63% 1,019 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.1% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 72.9
47% 65.9 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 55.8
Splatting 55
48% 58.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 134 119 151 136 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 490
Mixed 399
SusWrite 172
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 57.9
197% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 358
273% 368 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 109%
Great: 115%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
57GB free
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 451 322 322 322 322 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 493
Mixed 471
SusWrite 371
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 57.8
187% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 366
DQ Mixed 374
282% 377 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 119%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax GZNG43F-18---------- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3266 MHz clocked @ 1633 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 36
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 29.8
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 111%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,521 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $683
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback