Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 68.2 2-Core 172 63% 108 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 584 55% 457 Pts	64-Core 1,615 100% 1,615 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp 8,552 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 140 Reflection 184 Parallax 198 114% 174 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 187 Splatting 121 117% 145 fps
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 140%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 412GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 451 451 449 452 451 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 459 Write 444 Mixed 376 SusWrite 450 98% 433 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 70.3 4K Mixed 42.3 135% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 356 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0-CK 8x8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	MC Read 46 MC Write 38.5 MC Mixed 34.9 114% 39.8 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 6.9 24% 8.57 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 100%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	18x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v21stBench 74%, 880 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 66%, 741 samples	7x

RAM
M393B1G70BH0-CK 4x8GBSamsungBench 59%, 8 samples	3x
M393B1K70CH0-CH 4x8GBSamsungBench 51%, 15 samples	3x
M393B2G70DB0-YK 2x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 4 samples	2x

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $222

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16