Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime24.5 Days
Run DateMay 07 '19 at 03:56
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 97.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
79% 134 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 485
56% 434 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)
EVGA(3842 2690) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 33.7
Reflection 35.2
Parallax 46.5
28% 38.5 fps
MRender 47.3
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 32.8
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB-$503
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 253 164 87 92 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 343
Write 318
Mixed 266
SusWrite 160
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 23.7
91% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 165
122% 162 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 100%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 108 109 108 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 125
Write 128
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 107
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 85%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 2TB
2TB free, PID 61f5
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 322
Write 307
Mixed 290
391% 307 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 20.9
1,656% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 35
DQ Mixed 25.9
2,151% 27.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 383%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 23.9
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 22.1
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 47.8
84% 47.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $1,024
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback