Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230 39,605 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 81.7 1-Core 76.1 2-Core 133 60% 97 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 346 33% 275 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M 6,267 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 204A) 2GB CLim: 775 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	7.78% Terrible	Lighting 9.2 Reflection 10.8 Parallax 7.41 8% 9.13 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 9.7 Splatting 10.4 8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.78% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T2535T240G 240GB 3,019 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0412A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 23 22 46 18 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 453 Write 52.6 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 30.4 30% 144 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 2.2 34% 8.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Elpida EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 14GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.2% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 14.1 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 14.3 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GTX 560MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,267 samples	477x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	9x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	9x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	61x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	44x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 3x4GBSamsungBench 37%, 447 samples	37x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $300