Asus X580VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus X580VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X580VD
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '19 at 10:45
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 209
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 400
54% 400 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1A10) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Lighting 6.77
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 6.06
6% 12.5 fps
MRender 7.57
Gravity 5.43
Splatting 13
8% 8.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 181GB
169GB free
Firmware: EMT2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 157 160 188 159 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 532
Write 472
Mixed 350
SusWrite 174
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 49.5
174% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 236
190% 264 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
862GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 152 156 128 155 161 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 79%
Wilk GOODRAM 4GB
1GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.5 3.1 2.6 2.8 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
2.56% Terrible
Read 10
Write 1.8
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 2.8
5% 4.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.56%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X580VD Builds (Compare 1,191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X580VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback