Asus M5A97

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '19 at 00:41
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 56.6
2-Core 114
56% 87 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 227
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460 v2
MSI(1462 2329) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 995 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 7.58
Parallax 6.34
5% 6.51 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 8.37
Splatting 8.13
6% 7.04 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD G3 S eries 120GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.3.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 90 95 92 94 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 159
Write 116
Mixed 132
SusWrite 91.2
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 31.7
119% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 109
87% 122 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 54%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
160GB free
Firmware: GM4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 76 75 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 59
Write 57
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 75.4
41% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback